Our clients often ask us for suggestions in selecting a Trademark for their products or services. Our response is always the same – it depends...
On one hand, do they want to create a completely coined name (i.e., something no one has ever heard of like eBay or Google) or use an arbitrary mark (i.e., a term we have heard of but that’s use is arbitrary in connection with the goods or services provided such as AMAZON for online retail store services or APPLE for computers).
On the other, do they want a mark that creates instant interest in the product or service because it is suggestive or describes of trait thereof (e.g., ORANGE CRUSH for orange-flavored soft drinks or COPPERTONE for suntan oil).
No matter what they decide a great name should be catchy and memorable, should create interest in the product or service, and most importantly be registerable as a trademark - that is capable of registration on the principal register maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO").
A common problem in selecting a trademark that would create instant interest is the temptation to use descriptive or generic terms - marks that directly convey characteristics of the goods (e.g., RED SHOES for shoes that are red).
Unfortunately, descriptive terms are not registerable as trademarks, absent proof of a secondary meaning (i.e., you have been using it for five years or you have spent millions in advertising of the mark).
So what is the best way to select a trademark for your products or services?
Coin or use arbitrary terms if you intend on building the brand from scratch. Note, this will take more effort and resources as consumers will need to be educated via advertising and otherwise as to your product or services provided in connection with that mark.
In the alternative, if you want that instant buzz which comes with suggestive marks, be cautious and avoid generic, descriptive, and non- inherently distinctive marks as they will not be registerable before the USPTO nor protected from infringement by others. Make sure that the terms you use in your trademark do not merely describe an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose or use of your products or services. Rather, select a trademark that requires some bit of imagination, thought or perception to reach a conclusion as to the nature of your products.
The Trademark Company
Friday, October 2, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(56)
-
▼
October
(11)
- Rosetta Stone: Can It Unlock the Secrets of Tradem...
- Mischa Barton in Trademark Battle
- Politics as Unusual: Democrat Owens Accused of Tra...
- For Immediate Release: Case Update: Domainers Beware
- Coach Hits the Target
- Getting to the Heart of NFL Throw-Back Jerseys: It...
- Tips From The Insider: Trademark Lawyers’ Dirty Li...
- Trademark Infringement to the Max: Trademark Prote...
- Tips from the Insider: Do You Need a Research Repo...
- The Apple of Their Eye
- Tips from the Insider: Selecting a Great Trademark
-
▼
October
(11)
The Trademark Company's Fan Box
The Trademark Company on Facebook
The Trademark Company Blog
BlinkBits
BlinkList
Blogmarks
Buddymarks
CiteUlike
del.icio.us
Diigo
DZone
Earthlink
FeedMarker
Flog this!
feedmelinks
Furl
Google
Give a Link
Gravee
igooi
ISEdb
Lilisto
Linkagogo
Linkroll
Looklater
ma.gnolia
Maple.nu
Marktd
Mr. Wong
My-Tuts
Netscape
Netvouz
Newsvine
NShout
Onlywire
PlugIM
RawSugar
RecommendzIt
reddit
Scuttle
SearchMob
Segnalo
Shadows
Simpy
Sphinn
Spurl
Squidoo
StumbleUpon
Taggly
tagtooga
TalkDigger
Tellfriends
Wink
Yahoo MyWeb
BlinkList
Blogmarks
Buddymarks
CiteUlike
del.icio.us
Diigo
DZone
Earthlink
FeedMarker
Flog this!
feedmelinks
Furl
Give a Link
Gravee
igooi
ISEdb
Lilisto
Linkagogo
Linkroll
Looklater
ma.gnolia
Maple.nu
Marktd
Mr. Wong
My-Tuts
Netscape
Netvouz
Newsvine
NShout
Onlywire
PlugIM
RawSugar
RecommendzIt
Scuttle
SearchMob
Segnalo
Shadows
Simpy
Sphinn
Spurl
Squidoo
StumbleUpon
Taggly
tagtooga
TalkDigger
Tellfriends
Wink
Yahoo MyWeb
No comments:
Post a Comment